<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] Lattest Articles]]></title>
    <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Making Decisions Using Randomized Evaluations]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/5b4522b97a0a6f330530214321dd8fd3</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/5b4522b97a0a6f330530214321dd8fd3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I really liked this article from a recent Economist: Economics focus: Control freaks; Are randomised evaluations a better way of doing aid and development policy

Laboratory scientists peer into...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_Z-tqVTd9fPI/SG_Z6ZXS3NI/AAAAAAAAAgQ/xBKMS9Xp4iY/s1600-h/D2408FN0.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_Z-tqVTd9fPI/SG_Z6ZXS3NI/AAAAAAAAAgQ/xBKMS9Xp4iY/s400/D2408FN0.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5219630090409925842" /></a>I really liked this article from a recent Economist: <a href="http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11535592">Economics focus: Control freaks; Are “randomised evaluations” a better way of doing aid and development policy?</a>:<br /><br /><i>Laboratory scientists peer into microscopes to observe the behaviour of bugs. Epidemiologists track sickness in populations. Drug-company researchers run clinical trials. Economists have traditionally had a smaller toolkit. When studying growth, they put individual countries under the microscope or conduct cross-country macroeconomic studies (a bit like epidemiology). But they had nothing like drug trials. Economic data were based on observation and modelling, not controlled experiment.<br /><br />That is changing. A tribe of economists, most from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), have begun to champion the latest thing in development economics: “randomised evaluations” in which different policies—to boost school attendance, say—are tested by randomly assigning them to different groups...<br /><br />Randomised evaluations are a good way to answer microeconomic questions... often, they provide information that could be got in no other way. To take bednets: supporters of distributing free benefits say that only this approach can spread the use of nets quickly enough to eradicate malaria. Supporters of charging retort that cost-sharing is necessary to establish a reliable system of supply and because people value what they pay for. Both ideas sound plausible and there was no way of telling in advance who was right. But the trial clearly showed how people behave...</i><br /><br />Reading the whole article is best, but the core idea is that it might be helpful to conduct experiments on samples before applying policies to entire populations.  In other words, don't just rely on theories, "conventional wisdom," "best practices," and so on... try to determine what actually works, and then expand the successful approaches to the overall group.  <br /><br />I thought immediately of the application to digital security, where, for example, bloggers write posts like <a href="http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2008/06/challenges-to-s.html">Challenges to sell Information Security products and services</a>:<br /><br /><i>Everyone knows (I hope) that some security measures are simply necessary — period. Firewalls and Antivirus, for example, are by common sense necessary.</i>  <br /><br />Care to test that "common sense" in an experiment?<div class="blogger-post-footer">Copyright 2003-2008 Richard Bejtlich and TaoSecurity (taosecurity.blogspot.com and www.taosecurity.com)</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/evaluations">evaluations</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/common sense">common sense</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/laboratory scientists peer">laboratory scientists peer</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/information security products">information security products</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/populations">populations</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/answer microeconomic questions">answer microeconomic questions</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/epidemiologists track sickness">epidemiologists track sickness</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/people behave">people behave</category>
      <source url="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2008/07/making-decisions-using-randomized.html">Making Decisions Using Randomized Evaluations</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Life Is A Technology Museum]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e03c2c1f709b1fd2b9485bcd6500f448</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e03c2c1f709b1fd2b9485bcd6500f448</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I went this morning with my family to the Museum of Natural History on Manhattan's Upper West Side. In the subway I noticed one of the machines that sells MetroCards (the fare cards for the NYC...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I went this morning with my family to the Museum of Natural History on Manhattan's Upper West Side. In the subway I noticed one of the machines that sells <a href="http://www.mta.info/metrocard/">MetroCards</a> (the fare cards for the NYC transit) rebooting;. I wasn't able to get my cell phone camera going until it was in the boot-time banner. Turns out the machine was a bit of a museum piece itself.

<img alt="metrocard.nt4.sp3.small.jpg" src="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/metrocard.nt4.sp3.small.jpg" width="300" height="400" />

Before that I watched it in blue-screen mode and observed that it was running Windows NT 4.0 Workstation Service Pack 3. Wow, that's pretty old. There hasn't been any support at all for NT 4 since January 2005, and that was for Service Pack 6 I believe. To date the software, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=121A62A5-1086-4DE9-AE38-C1ED6DE86B9A&displaylang=en">SP3 was released 8 years ago</a>.

Back to the MetroCard machine itself, there's some more detail on the screen:

<img alt="metrocard.nt4.sp3.banner.jpg" src="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/metrocard.nt4.sp3.banner.jpg" width="398" height="278" />

The banner is customized with "Metropolitan Transportation Authority" and it says, I think, "with CTS AVM". I did a little Googling and struck out on what that means. If any of you can help me out I'm curious.

The moral of this story is an old one, how technology users can be incredibly conservative, or perhaps "thrifty" is the right word. I ought to follow up with the MTA to see if they plan to leave these systems as-is. Yeah, maybe "if it ain't broke don't fix it," but why did it reboot?<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=b3d6a575cf38e1a99dacb11f50f76d11" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=b3d6a575cf38e1a99dacb11f50f76d11" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/327710269" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/museum">museum</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/workstation service pack">workstation service pack</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/service pack">service pack</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/cell phone camera">cell phone camera</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/metropolitan transportation authority">metropolitan transportation authority</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/metrocard machine">metrocard machine</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/machine">machine</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/banner">banner</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/boot-time banner">boot-time banner</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/327710269/life_is_a_technology_museum.html">Life Is A Technology Museum</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Russian Hackers To Lithuania: All Your Base Are Belong To Us]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e13cd6fa18a684c1925f2d4bd1987d44</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e13cd6fa18a684c1925f2d4bd1987d44</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hundreds of Lithuanian government and corporate Web sites were hacked and plastered with Soviet-era symbols and other digital graffiti this week in what appears to be a coordinated cyber attack...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hundreds of Lithuanian government and corporate Web sites were hacked and plastered with Soviet-era symbols and other digital graffiti this week in what appears to be a coordinated cyber attack launched by Russian hacker groups.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/russian hacker">russian hacker</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/cyber attack">cyber attack</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/soviet-era symbols">soviet-era symbols</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/web sites">web sites</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/digital graffiti">digital graffiti</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/lithuanian government">lithuanian government</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/week">week</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/appears">appears</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/hundreds">hundreds</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Russian_Hackers_To_Lithuania_All_Your_Base_Are_Belong_To_Us">Russian Hackers To Lithuania: All Your Base Are Belong To Us</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Storm botnet stages Fourth of July attacks]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/1d7b2231099ea5206c82a9b7927d5255</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/1d7b2231099ea5206c82a9b7927d5255</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hackers tried to entice users into downloading the Storm bot Trojan on July 4 with a flood of Fourth of July spam containing links to malicious sites, several security companies...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hackers tried to entice users into downloading the Storm bot Trojan on July 4 with a flood of Fourth of July spam containing links to malicious sites, several security companies reported.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=ZLwRCg"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=ZLwRCg" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/327450506" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/july">july</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/storm bot trojan">storm bot trojan</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/july spam">july spam</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/malicious sites">malicious sites</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security companies">security companies</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/entice users">entice users</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/fourth">fourth</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/flood">flood</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/hackers">hackers</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/327450506/article.do">Storm botnet stages Fourth of July attacks</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Daily Mail publisher admits to stolen laptop]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/9af68c57ed3f10d814be79e5d395b72b</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/9af68c57ed3f10d814be79e5d395b72b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: Security Breach

Date Reported
7/4/08

Organization
Daily Mail and General Trust plc

Contractor/Consultant/Branch
Northcliffe Media
Associated Newspapers Ltd

Victims
Staff, suppliers...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/security+breach" rel="tag">Security Breach</a><br><br>
<img src="http://breachblog.com/images/95781-88451/dailymail.jpg" width="203" align="right" height="43"><font size="2"><b>Date Reported: </b><br>7/4/08<br><br><b>Organization: </b><br><a href="http://www.dmgt.co.uk/">Daily Mail and General Trust plc</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Contractor/Consultant/Branch:</span><br><a href="http://www.thisisnorthcliffe.co.uk/">Northcliffe Media</a> <br><a href="http://www.associatednewspapers.com/">Associated Newspapers Ltd</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Victims:</span><br>Staff, suppliers and contributors<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Number Affected:</span><br>"thousands"<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Types of Data:</span><br>"name, address, bank account number and bank sort code"<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Breach Description:</span><br>"Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers has admitted that a laptop containing financial and personal details of thousands of staff, suppliers and contributors has been stolen."<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Reference URL:</span><br><a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/security/data-control/news/index.cfm?newsid=9904">ComputerWorldUK</a> <br><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jul/04/dailymail.dmgt1?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=media">Guardian News (UK)</a> <br><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jul/04/dailymail.dmgt?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=media">Guardian News (UK) additional info</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Report Credit:</span><br>Guardian Newspaper<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Response:</span><br>From the online sources cited above:<br><br>Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers has admitted that a laptop containing financial and personal details of thousands of staff, suppliers and contributors has been stolen.<br><br>A Daily Mail &amp; General Trust spokeswoman said: "DMGT confirms that a laptop company computer containing certain confidential information was stolen last week.<br><br>After months of criticising "criminally careless" government departments for losing confidential records, the company has been forced to send out an embarrassing letter telling journalists they may now be at risk of identity theft<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] This is the same Daily Mail managed by Associated Newspapers that according to The Guardian "has been at the forefront of coverage of the recent bank and government department missing data scandals".&nbsp; It would be very difficult for Associated Newspapers to claim that they didn't know any better than to store confidential information on a poorly protected laptop.</span><br><br>Details such as names, addresses, bank account numbers and sort codes were on the laptop<br><br>the laptop was "password protected" but tell recipients to contact their banks and also "consult the government website ... for advice on avoiding or dealing with identity theft"<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] The mention of password protection is nothing more than an effort to minimize the effect of the breach.&nbsp; It does very little (if anything) to protect the personal information.</span><br><br>In a letter to those who details were affected, Simon Dyson, finance director at Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers, and Martyn Hindley, his counterpart at sister company Northcliffe, said it was likely that the details had been erased by the thief.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] How is the conclusion drawn?&nbsp; I don't see how there could be enough information to determine what the thief was likely to do.</span><br><br>From the letter to affected persons from the Associated Newspapers group finance director, Simon Dyson, and his Northcliffe counterpart, Martyn Hindley:<br><br>"Unfortunately one of the company's laptops has been stolen."<br><br>"The contents included personal data, some of which related to you."<br><br>"The laptop was password-protected. "<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] So what?&nbsp; This won't adequately protect the information on the laptop, so why mention it?</span><br><br>"We are writing to you as quickly as possible to alert you to the fact that the theft has happened and to inform you of the data types lost, so that you can take appropriate action."<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] I guess we should give some credit for the quick notification, if nothing else.</span><br><br>"In your case, your name, address, bank account number and bank sort code were the sensitive information lost."<br><br>"The likelihood is that this theft was carried out in an opportunistic manner by a thief who will not realise that there is any personal data on the laptop and who may just erase what is on the hard disk in order to disguise the fact that the laptop is stolen."<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] This is nothing more than speculation.&nbsp; I can't imagine that there are any specific facts for which this conclusion is based on.</span><br><br>"We have, of course, notified the police of the theft of the laptop and are talking to the Office of the Information Commissioner about what has happened."<br><br>"On behalf of the company, I would like to offer my sincere apologies for any annoyance and inconvenience to you that this breach of security may cause."<br><br>"I can assure you that we take security of personal data very seriously and have, since this incident, which was inadvertently caused by a technical issue, already further strengthened procedures."<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] This breach was caused by a "technical issue"?&nbsp; Like what?&nbsp; I presume that the technical aspects surrounding this breach were working exactly as they were designed to in the manner of which that they were implemented.&nbsp; Without further elaboration, "strengthened procedures" is subjective and means little.&nbsp; Organizations should offer details, instead of general statements in order to bolster some sense of confidence.</span><br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Commentary:</span><br>This breach must be embarrassing for Associated Newspapers.&nbsp; A breach like this should be embarrassing for any organizations.&nbsp; Unencrypted lost of stolen laptops storing personal (or other confidential) information is a pretty well-known risk nowadays.&nbsp; An unacceptable risk for most. <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Past Breaches:</span><br>Unknown<br></font><br>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Es/breachblog?i=http://breachblog.com/2008/07/05/dailymail.aspx" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/personal information">personal information</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/daily mail publisher">daily mail publisher</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/daily mail">daily mail</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/personal">personal</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/store confidential information">store confidential information</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/laptop">laptop</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/personal data">personal data</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/laptop company computer">laptop company computer</category>
      <source url="http://breachblog.com/2008/07/05/dailymail.aspx">Daily Mail publisher admits to stolen laptop</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A bloggers network to be proud of]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/dde65a2c18ee60646147982ffc29b546</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/dde65a2c18ee60646147982ffc29b546</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I started blogging about 2 and half-years ago because I felt like it would be fun to add my two cents to the public debate. When Brad Feld introduced me to the Feedburner guys I was given an insiders...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I started blogging about 2 and half-years ago because I felt like it would be fun to add my two cents to the public debate.&nbsp; When Brad Feld introduced me to the <a class="zem_slink" title="FeedBurner" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FeedBurner" rel="wikipedia">Feedburner</a> guys I was given an insiders view into the quickly developing blogging world.&nbsp; When Feedburner started networks, I thought it would be interesting to start a network of all the security blogs that I was reading.&nbsp; I also inherently knew in my gut that eventually there would be some common good that would benefit all of the members of the network by aggregating our content and buying power for ads. I also believed and still do believe that there are other ways that a network such as the Security Bloggers Network can be a force for good.</p>

<p>However, reading the <a href="http://networks.feedburner.com/Security-Bloggers-Network/feed">SBN</a> feed tonight I was just blown away! From being on the road, I had not read the SBN feed in my Newsgator reader for almost 2 days.&nbsp; I had over 160 articles cued up in the feed.&nbsp; Forget for a moment that the Security Bloggers Network now has over 160 blogs and a combined feedburner subscriber base of almost 67,000 readers!&nbsp; The content is king.&nbsp; Going through the articles I could not believe the total coverage, the ongoing commentary and give and take, but most of all it was the quality.&nbsp; There are so many great members of the network who are just so damn smart and are writing about such important stuff. </p>

<p>I am humbled and incredibly proud of the what the Security Bloggers Network has become. If you are interested in security, whether it be the technical aspects of security, the business of security or the security industry, you cannot afford to miss this SBN feed.&nbsp; </p>

<p>We are kicking around a lot of new activities and ways to publicize the member blogs of the network over the coming months.&nbsp; Stay tuned for details, but in the meantime keep reading, you won't be sorry! </p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/9b6c2146-2568-4698-8ef8-cab9f379300f/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=9b6c2146-2568-4698-8ef8-cab9f379300f" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=RrvVwd"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=RrvVwd" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Xx3akJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Xx3akJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=3D7nHJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=3D7nHJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=cqGxyJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=cqGxyJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=vYhNlJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=vYhNlJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=tTXatj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=tTXatj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=qWb1Tj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=qWb1Tj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/327447910" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/blogs">blogs</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security blogs">security blogs</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security industry">security industry</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security bloggers network">security bloggers network</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/sbn feed tonight">sbn feed tonight</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/sbn feed">sbn feed</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/feed">feed</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/327447910/a-bloggers-netw.html">A bloggers network to be proud of</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Facebook Group for Complex Event Processing]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/d695e4526a4d0dd002dcf9a65d21467f</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/d695e4526a4d0dd002dcf9a65d21467f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[We now have a FaceBook group for CEP , so if you are into on-line social networking, enjoy
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23977227924

Feel free to addany links or messages you like. Vendors...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now have a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23977227924" target="_blank">FaceBook group for CEP</a>, so if you are into on-line social networking, enjoy!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23977227924" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23977227924</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23977227924" target="_blank"></a></p>
<p>Feel free to add any links or messages you like.  Vendors sites welcome too!   Just network, market, relax and have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/facebook">facebook</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/addany links">addany links</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/on-line social">on-line social</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/vendors sites">vendors sites</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/market">market</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/messages">messages</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/enjoy">enjoy</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/fun">fun</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/07/05/facebook-group-for-complex-event-processing/">Facebook Group for Complex Event Processing</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Google Changes Home Page, Adding Link to Privacy Policy]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/db04b1ce7820a290973698de7b06ed26</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/db04b1ce7820a290973698de7b06ed26</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The word privacy now appears on Googles home page, with a link to the companys privacy...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The word “privacy” now appears on Google’s home page, with a link to the company’s privacy policy.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/googles home page">googles home page</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/companys privacy policy">companys privacy policy</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/link">link</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/word privacy">word privacy</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/appears">appears</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Google_Changes_Home_Page_Adding_Link_to_Privacy_Policy">Google Changes Home Page, Adding Link to Privacy Policy</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Firefox Users Most Secure on Internet, Study Reveals]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e4d10d61e257672eba6e096e12c35e4a</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/e4d10d61e257672eba6e096e12c35e4a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox fans might rest a little easier these days after a study released Tuesday revealed that its users are most secure on the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox fans might rest a little easier these days after a study released Tuesday revealed that its users are most secure on the Internet. ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/mozilla firefox fans">mozilla firefox fans</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/secure">secure</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/users">users</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/study">study</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/rest">rest</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/easier">easier</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/tuesday">tuesday</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/days">days</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Firefox_Users_Most_Secure_on_Internet_Study_Reveals">Firefox Users Most Secure on Internet, Study Reveals</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Green Security]]></title>
      <link>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/220b652440331d2515c2ca9757e0442d</link>
      <guid>http://mobile.securityratty.com/article/220b652440331d2515c2ca9757e0442d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[You all know how environmentally-conscience I am. Actually, I don't consider myself to be all that &quot;green,&quot; aside from the environmental science merit badge I earned as a Scout. However, working for a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_Z-tqVTd9fPI/SG7ukOldnaI/AAAAAAAAAgI/Zt7g6eIJEpg/s1600-h/green.jpeg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_Z-tqVTd9fPI/SG7ukOldnaI/AAAAAAAAAgI/Zt7g6eIJEpg/s400/green.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5219371324326911394" /></a>You all know how environmentally-conscience I am.  Actually, I don't consider myself to be all that "green," aside from the <a href="http://meritbadge.org/wiki/index.php/Environmental_Science">environmental science</a> merit badge I earned as a Scout.  However, working for a global company (and especially the Air Force, in a prior life) reinforces one of my personal tenets: <b>move data, not people</b>.  In other words, I look for ways to acquire security data remotely, and move it to me.  I'd rather not fly to a location where the information resides; data centers are too distributed, cold, noisy, and cramped for me to want to spend a lot of time there.  <br /><br />So, when Bill Brenner of CSO asked if I had thoughts on "Green IT," I think I surprised him by answering postively.  You can read some of what I said in his article <a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/410513/Cost_Cutting_Through_Green_IT_Security_Real_or_Myth_">Cost-Cutting Through Green IT Security: Real or Myth?</a><br /><br /><i>For Richard Bejtlich, director of incident response at General Electric, the biggest green security challenge is in how the company moves people around. Incident response investigations often require people to fly to offices spread across the country. But travel can be expensive and the environment certainly doesn't benefit from the jet fuel that's burned in the process.<br /><br />Bejtlich's solution is to find more remote ways for employees to conduct incident response.<br /><br />"Rather than have the carbon footprint of a plane trip, we can instead focus on moving the data we need (for incident response) instead of moving the people," he says. Bejtlich says a lot of the work can get done using virtual technology without reducing the quality of the security.<br /><br />To achieve this at GE, Bejtlich has made use of F-Response, a vendor neutral, patent-pending software utility that allows an investigator to conduct live forensics, data recovery, and e-discovery over an IP network using the tools of their choice. "For $5,000 we can use the F-Response enterprise product throughout the company," he says. "It's a very good deal."<br /><br />Bejtlich is also a believer in letting employees work from home. Like the reduction in air travel, working from home means fewer people burning gas on the way to the office.<br /><br />"We encourage people to work from home so they don't waste energy on travel. The incident response team is all over the world anyway, so we really don't need to be in an office," he says. "Doing the job virtually makes budgetary sense, we spend more time getting the work done, and the bonus is it lowers our carbon footprint."<br /><br />Virtual wonders<br /><br />Bejtlich's success with virtual technology is music to the ears of Evolutionary IT's Guarino, who sees virtualization as a key to consolidating the IT environment and achieving green security. </i><br /><br />Let me make a few clarifications.  First, no one at GE uses <a href="http://www.f-response.com/">F-Response</a>.  I mentioned it to Bill as an example of the sort of tool one could use to do remote forensics.  I have a copy ready to test and I spent an hour on the phone speaking with Matt Shannon from F-Response, and I have high hopes for the product.  Please don't read this as an endorsement of any single product.  I mentioned F-Response to help get my point across to Bill.<br /><br />Second, I don't see the "virtual technology" angle here.  I didn't talk about "virtualization," so maybe the term was just used inappropriately.<br /><br />Otherwise, I agree with my quotes on remote IR and working from home offices.  They are key initiatives I would encourage other companies to adopt.  <br /><br />In fact, you could think of the home office as an example of <b>move work, not people.</b>  Keep the people in place and move the job to them.  In an increasingly competitive market where people with true skills are scarce, it's unreasonable to expect talent to uproot and migrate to an employer's location.<div class="blogger-post-footer">Copyright 2003-2008 Richard Bejtlich and TaoSecurity (taosecurity.blogspot.com and www.taosecurity.com)</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/require people">require people</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/company moves people">company moves people</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/company">company</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/incident response">incident response</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/fewer people">fewer people</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/incident response investigations">incident response investigations</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://mobile.securityratty.com/tag/single product">single product</category>
      <source url="http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2008/07/green-security.html">Green Security</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
